Connect with us
nairametrics
UBA ads

Blurb

Global monetary commentary – Comercio Partners

The global economy has enjoyed a steady growth since the financial crisis of 2009, however, there are concerns of a downturn amidst global trade tensions.

Published

on

Global Monetary Commentary

The global economy has enjoyed a prolonged expansion since the financial crisis of 2009. However, over the past two years, there have been major concerns of another global economic downturn amidst global trade tensions.

US-Sino trade tensions, as well as prolonged uncertainty on Brexit, have been major concerns to global economic growth. There were positive surprises to growth in advanced economies (Growth was better than expected in the United States and Japan) with weaker-than-expected activity in emerging market and developing economies. Elsewhere in emerging Asia and Latin America, activity has disappointed.

UBA ADS

[READ ALSO: How Nigeria’s economy could be affected by global events – Analysts]

The intensified trade tension and global economic uncertainty have ushered in a dovish stance from global central banks who are essentially keen on supporting the fragile growth trajectory the global economy has been on over the last two years.

Global Interest rate trend

GTBank 728 x 90

Global monetary policy direction

Era of negative bond yields

Concerns about the strength of the global economy, US-China trade war, geopolitics, particularly in the Middle East has ushered in a risk-off sentiment in the global financial market, as Investors are rushing to get their hands on the safest assets available, such as government bonds. Leading to a significant increase in the number of bonds with negative yields. Almost $12 trillion of investment-grade corporate and government bonds have negative yields, predominately in Europe and Japan, according to Barclays data. That’s the largest amount since the middle of 2016.

Negative bond yield

onebank728 x 90

The US Federal Reserve cut the benchmark interest rate by 25 bps during its July meeting, the first rate cut since the financial crisis, as inflation remains subdued amid heightened concerns about the economic outlook and ongoing trade tensions with China. However, the Federal Reserve has ruled out an extended policy easing cycle. It characterized the rate cut as “a mid-cycle adjustment to policy” and stated that the 25-basis-point easing was “not the beginning of a long series of rate cuts”.

[READ ALSO: Nigeria’s total Foreign Trade hits N8.6 trillion in Q2 2019, up by 4.4%]

The announcement was immediately trailed by a sell-off in most risk assets as the market had priced in additional cuts in 2019, Yields on 10-year US treasury climbed to 2.053% and the U.S. dollar climbed to levels not seen since May 2017.

app

One year US treasury yield trend

The central bank of Colombia left the benchmark interest rate unchanged at 4.25% at its July 26th, 2019 meeting. Members of the monetary committee collectively voted to leave the rate unchanged for the fifteenth straight month (last change was in Jan 2018), stating that new information is indicating a strong Q2 economic growth which will be supported by investment in machinery and equipment and public consumption.

The Committee said that they will continue to monitor developments around inflation which rose to 3.43% in June from 3.31% in the prior month mostly boosted by the cost of food, economic activity and balance of payments and take actions depending on new data.

One year columbian eurobond trend

The Central Bank of Brazil voted unanimously to lower its key Selic rate by 50bps to a record low of 6% during its July meeting. The Committee emphasized that recent data on economic activity indicate weaker economic activity from previous quarters and that risks of a global slowdown persist, as brazil economy grew by 0.5% in Q1 2019 from 1.1% in Q4 2018. The Committee signalled further easing, highlighting; a decelerating global economy and slower domestic inflation.

app

One-Year Brazillian eurobond trend

As widely expected, The South African Reserve Bank cut its benchmark repo rate by 25 bps to 6.5% on July 18th, 2019 It was the first-rate cut since March last year, amid a persistently uncertain environment. Members of the monetary committee noted that inflation expectations continued to moderate and said that they will focus on anchoring it near the mid-point of the inflation target range. The Committee added that future policy decisions are highly data-dependent, sensitive to the assessment of the balance of risks to the outlook. Also, policymakers said that the GDP is expected to rebound.

One year South Africa eurobond trend

The Central Bank of Turkey slashed its one-week repo auction rate by 425bps to 19.75% during its July meeting, saying inflation outlook continued to improve as domestic demand conditions and the tight monetary policy continue to support disinflation. In addition, policymakers voiced concerns about rising protectionism and uncertainty regarding global economic policies.

[READ ALSO: Nigerian Eurobonds Weaken as Trade war Depresses Oil Prices]

Early July, President Erdogan sacked the governor of the Turkish central bank, Murat Cetinkaya and replaced him with his deputy Murat Uysal. Before the sack of Murat Cetinkaya there have been speculations that he had a disagreement with the government on cutting the interest rate.

One year Turkish eurobond trend

The benchmark interest rate in China was last recorded at 4.35%. It was last cut by 25 basis points in October 2015. On September 27th, 2018, the People’s Bank of China left interest rates for open market operations unchanged even after the Federal Reserve s decision to tighten monetary policy. However, the People’s Bank of China made a cut to the cash reserve ratio earlier this year, as they cut the cash reserve ratio by 100 bps. reserve requirement ratios (RRRs) are currently 13.5% from 14.5%.

One year Chinese eurobond trend

The Monetary policy Committee of the Central Bank at its July meeting maintained the benchmark interest rate of 13.5%. In a follow up to the May meeting and its five-year strategic plan, CBN has issued 2 circulars, essentially aimed at implementing its strategic intent of reducing the crowding-out effect of the private sector with respect to bank credit. On the back of the circulars, Yields declined sharply as a sizeable amount of liquidity was” freed-up” driving yields to their lowest points in 18 months.

CBN governor Godwin Emefiele said at a press conference he is not in a hurry to bring interest rates down but will start reviewing bank’s loan to deposit ratio after September 30th aiming at increase lending and stimulate growth.

One year Nigerian eurobond trend

More monetary easing likely as trade tensions escalates

The continued dovish stance of global Central banks has created a “wall of Money” looking to get deployed at the best yields possible. This has seen yields drop significantly through the month of July, particularly in emerging markets. The on-going trade dispute between the US and China remains the elephant in the room.

[READ ALSO: NNPC and China Oil Corporation seek to expand $16 billion trade investment]

How things shape up on that front would play a key role in determining monetary policy posture for global central Banks for the remainder of the year. Barring any negative idiosyncratic factors, these developments should bode well for the Nigerian Fixed income market as we expect to see inflows in emerging markets with good fundamentals and attractive yields.

 

Patricia
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blurb

Why Insurance firms are selling off their PFAs

It has not been uncommon over the years to have insurance companies with pension subsidiaries.

Published

on

Why Insurance firms are selling off their PFAs

The idea of mitigating risks and curtailing losses at the bare minimum begins from the insurance industry and only crosses into the pension space with the need for retirement planning. For this reason, it has not been uncommon over the years to have insurance companies with pension subsidiaries. However, controlling the wealth of people is no easy feat – and crossover companies are beginning to think it might not be worth it competing with the big guns; that is, the pension fund administrators (PFAs) that already cater to the majority of Nigerians.

A few months ago, AXA Mansard Insurance Plc announced that its shareholders have approved the company’s plan to sell its pension management subsidiary, AXA Mansard Pensions Ltd, as well as a few undisclosed real estate investments. It did not provide any reason for the divestment. More recently, AIICO Insurance Plc also let go of majority ownership in its pension arm, AIICO Pension Managers Ltd. FCMB Pensions Ltd announced its plans to acquire 70% stakes in the pension company, while also acquiring an additional 26% stake held by other shareholders, ultimately bringing the proposed acquisition to a 96% stake in AIICO Pension. The reason for the sell-off by AIICO does not also appear to be attributed to poor performance as the group’s profit in 2019 had soared by 88% driven by growth across all lines of business within the group.

UBA ADS

 So why are they selling them off? 

Pension Fund Administration is, no doubt, a competitive landscape. Asides the wealth of the over N10 trillion industry, there is also the overarching advantage that pension contributors do not change PFAs regularly. Therefore, making it hard to compete against the big names and industry leaders that have been in the game for decades – the kinds of Stanbic IBTC, ARM, Premium Pension, Sigma, and FCMB. Of course, the fact that PFAs also make their money through fees means the bigger the size, the more money you make. With pressure to capitalize mounting, insurance firms will most likely spin off as they just don’t have the right focus, skills, and talents to compete.

The recent occurrence of PENCOM giving contributors the opportunity to switch from one PFA to another might have seemed like the perfect opportunity for the smaller pension companies to increase their market shares by offering better returns. More so, with the introduction of more aggrieved portfolios in the multi-fund structure comprising of RSA funds 1, 2, & 3, PFAs can invest in riskier securities and enhance their returns. However, the reality of things is that the smaller PFAs don’t have what it takes to effectively market to that effect. With the gains being made from the sector not particularly extraordinary, it is easier for them to employ their available resources into expanding their core business. There is also the fact that their focus now rests on meeting the new capital requirements laced by NAICOM. Like Monopoly, the next smart move is to sell underperforming assets just to keep their head above water.

READ MORE: AIICO seeks NSE’s approval for conducting Rights Issue

GTBank 728 x 90

Olasiji Omotayo, Head of Risk in a leading pension fund administrator, explained that “Most insurance businesses selling their pension subsidiaries may be doing so to raise funds. Recapitalization is a major challenge now for the insurance sector and the Nigerian Capital Market may not welcome any public offer at the moment. Consequently, selling their pension business may be their lifeline at the moment. Also, some may be selling for strategic reasons as it’s a business of scale. You have a lot of fixed costs due to regulatory requirements and you need a good size to be profitable. If you can’t scale up, you can also sell if you get a good offer.”

What the future holds

With the smaller PFAs spinning off, the Pension industry is about to witness the birth of an oligopoly like the Tier 1 players in the Banking sector. Interestingly, the same will also happen with Insurance. The only real issue is that we will now have limited choices. In truth, we don’t necessarily need many of them as long all firms remain competitive. But there is the risk that the companies just get comfortable with their population growth-induced expansion while simply focusing on low-yielding investments. The existence of the pandemic as well as the really low rates in the fixed-income market is, however, expected to propel companies to seek out creative ways to at least keep up with the constantly rising rate of inflation.

 

onebank728 x 90

Patricia
Continue Reading

Blurb

Nigerian Banks expected to write off 12% of its loans in 2020 

The Nigerian banking system has been through two major asset quality crisis.

Published

on

Nigerian Banks expected to write off 12% of its loans in 2020 

The Nigerian Banking Sector has witnessed a number of asset management challenges owing largely to macroeconomic shocks and, sometimes, its operational inefficiencies in how loans are disbursedRising default rates over time have led to periodic spikes in the non-performing loans (NPLs) of these institutions and it is in an attempt to curtail these challenges that changes have been made in the acceptable Loan to Deposit (LDR) ratios, amongst others, by the apex regulatory body, CBN. 

Projections by EFG Hermes in a recent research report reveal that as a result of the current economic challenges as well as what it calls “CBN’s erratic and unorthodox policies over the past five years,” banks are expected to write off around 12.3% of their loan books in constant currency terms between 2020 and 2022the highest of all the previous NPL crisis faced by financial institutions within the nation.  

UBA ADS

Note that Access Bank, FBN Holdings, Guaranty Trust Bank, Stanbic IBTC, United Bank for Africa and Zenith Bank were used to form the universe of Nigerian banks by EFG Hermes.  

READ MORE: What banks might do to avoid getting crushed by Oil & Gas Loans

Background  

GTBank 728 x 90

Over the past twelve years, the Nigerian banking system has been through two major asset quality crisisThe first is the 2009 to 2012 margin loan crisis and the other is the 2014 to 2018 oil price crash crisis 

The 2008-2012 margin loan crisis was born out of the lending institutions giving out cheap and readily-available credit for investments, focusing on probable compensation incentives over prudent credit underwriting strategies and stern risk management systems. The result had been a spike in NPL ratio from 6.3% in 2008 to 27.6% in 2009. The same crash in NPL ratio was witnessed in 2014 as well as a result of the oil price crash of the period which had crashed the Naira and sent investors packing. The oil price crash had resulted in the NPL ratio spiking from 2.3% in 2014 to 14.0% in 2016.  

Using its universe of banks, the NPL ratio spiked from an average of 6.1% in 2008 to 10.8% in 2009 and from 2.6% in 2014 to 9.1% in 2016. During both cycles, EFG Hermes estimated that the banks wrote-off between 10-12% of their loan book in constant currency terms.  

onebank728 x 90

 READ MORE: Ratings firm explains why bank non-performing loans could be worse than expected

The current situation 

Given the potential macro-economic shock with real GDP expected to contract by 4%, the Naira-Dollar exchange rate expected to devalue to a range of 420-450, oil export revenue expected to drop by as much as 50% in 2020 and the weak balance sheet positions of the regulator and AMCON, the risk of another significant NPL cycle is high. In order to effectively assess the impact of these on financial institutions, EFG Hermes modelled three different asset-quality scenarios for the banks all of which have their different implications for banks’ capital adequacy, growth rates and profitability.  These cases are the base case, lower case, and upper case. 

app

Base Case: The company’s base case scenario, which they assigned a 55% probability, the average NPL ratio and cost of risk was projected to increase from an average of 6.4% and 1.0% in 2019 to 7.6% and 5.3% in 2020 and 6.4% and 4.7% in 20201, before declining to 4.9% and 1.0% in 2024, respectively. Based on its assumptions, they expect banks to write-off around 12.3% of their loan books in constant currency terms between 2020 and 2022a rate that is marginally higher than the average of 11.3% written-off during the previous two NPL cycles. Under this scenario, estimated ROE is expected to plunge from an average of 21.8% in 2019 to 7.9% in 2020 and 7.7% in 2021 before recovering to 18.1% in 2024.  

Lower or Pessimistic Case: In its pessimistic scenario which has a 40% chance of occurrencethe company projects that the average NPL ratio will rise from 6.4% in 2019 to 11.8% in 2020 and 10.0% in 2021 before moderating to 4.9% by 2024It also estimates that the average cost of risk for its banks will peak at 10% in 2020 and 2021, fall to 5.0% in 2022, before moderating from 2023 onwards. Under this scenario, banks are expected to write off around as much as 26.6% of their loan books in constant currency terms over the next three years. Average ROE of the banks here is expected to drop to -8.8% in 2020, -21.4% in 2021 and -2.9% in 2022, before increasing to 19.7% in 2024.   

Upper or optimistic case: In a situation where the pandemic ebbs away and macro-economic activity rebounds quicklythe optimistic or upper case will hold. This, however, has just a 5% chance of occurrence. In this scenario, the company assumes that the average NPL ratio of the banks would increase from 6.4% in 2019 to 6.8% in 2020 and moderate to 4.8% by 2024Average cost of risk will also spike to 4.2% in 2020 before easing to 2.4% in 2021 and average 0.9% thereafter through the rest of our forecast period. Finally, average ROE will drop to 11.6% in 2020 before recovering to 14.4% in 2021 and 19.0% in 2024. 

With the highest probabilities ascribed to both the base case and the pessimistic scenario, the company has gone ahead to downgrade the rating of the entire sector to ‘Neutral’ with a probability-weighted average ROE (market cap-weighted) of 13.7% 2020 and 2024. The implication of the reduced earnings and the new losses from written-off loans could impact the short to medium term growth or value of banking stocks. However, in the long term, the sector will revert to the norm as they always do.   

app
Patricia
Continue Reading

Blurb

Even with a 939% jump in H1 Profit, Neimeth still needs to build consistency

Neimeth has been one of the better performers in the stock market in the last one year. 

Published

on

Even with a 939% jump in H1 profit, Neimeth still needs to build consistency 

Neimeth’s profit after tax for H1 2020 might have jumped by 939% from H1 2019, but there’s still so much the company needs to do to remain in the game. 

For the first time in years, Pharmaceutical companies across the globe are in the spotlight for a good reason.  As the COVID-19 pandemic rages on, the world waits patiently for this industry to produce a vaccine that can once again lead us back to the lives we all missed. Nigeria is also not an exception, it seems. One of Nigeria’s oldest pharmaceutical companies, Neimeth, has been one of the better performers in the stock market in the last one year. However, there is still so much the company needs to do to earn profits consistently. 

UBA ADS

READ MORE: Covid-19: List of pharmaceutical firms that will receive grants from the CBN

Neimeth’s recently released H1 2020 results show a jump of 19.4% in revenue from 976 million earned in H1 2019 to 1.165 billion in H1 2020. While this is impressive, its comparative Q2 results (Jan-March ‘ 20) show a drop in revenue of 25.4% from 748.8 million earned in Q2 2019, to the 568.7 million revenue in Q2 2020. In similar vein, while its profit-after-tax soared by 939% from 5.447 million in H1 2019 to 56.596 million in H1 2020, its quarter-by-quarter results show a drop of 118%. While there is a truth that some months are better performers than others, Neimeth’s extreme profit jump in the half-year results juxtaposed with the more-than-100% drop in the first quarter of this year, reveal wide-gap volatility in its earning potential. Its revenue breakdown attributes the quarter-by-quarter drop in revenue to a comparative drop in its ‘Animal Health’ product line by a whopping 897.42%. The ‘Pharmaceuticals’ line also only experienced a marginal jump of 2.57%. 

Full report here. 

GTBank 728 x 90

READ MORE: Nigeria records debt service to revenue ratio of 99% in first quarter of 2020.

Current & Post-Covid-19 Opportunities  

A 2017 PWC report had revealed that by 2020 the pharmaceutical market is expected to “more than double to $1.3 trillion. Mckinsey had also predicted that come 2026, Nigeria’s pharma market could reach $4 billion. The positive outlook of the industry is even more so, following the disclosure by the CBN to support critical sectors of the economy with 1.1 trillion intervention fund.  

onebank728 x 90

The CBN governor, Godwin Emefiele, had stated that about 1trillion of the fund would be used to support the local manufacturing sector while also boosting import substitution while the balance of 100 billion would be used to support the health authorities towards ensuring that laboratories, researchers and innovators are provided with the resources required to patent and produce vaccines and test kits in Nigeria. 

READ MORE: Airtel to acquire additional spectrum for $70 million 

While manufacturing a vaccine for the Covid-19 pandemic might be nothing short of wishful, the pandemic presents a global challenge that businesses in the healthcare industry could leverage. Through strategic R&D, it could uncover a range of solutions, particularly those that involve the infusion of locally-sourced raw materials.  

app

In order for the company to attain sustainable growth, it needs to come up with structures and systems that are dependable, while also tightening loose ends. One of such loose ends is its exposure to credit risk. It’s Q2 2020 reports reveal value for lost trade receivables of N693.6 million carried forward from 2019. To this end, it notes that while its operations expose it to a number of financial risks, it has put in place a risk management programme to protect the company against the potential adverse effects of these financial risks. 

At the company’s last annual general meeting (AGM), the managing director, Matthew Azoji, had also spoken on the company’s efforts to gain a larger market share through its initiation of bold and gradual expansion strategies.  

The total revenue growth and profitability of the half-year period undoubtedly signals a potential in the company. However, we might have to wait for the company’s strategies to crystalize and attain a level of consistency for an extended period before reassessing the long-term lucrativeness of its stock or otherwise. That said, it certainly should be on your watchlist.  

Patricia
Continue Reading