The Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer of AMCON, Ahmed Kuru has admitted that the corporation which he heads has failed in its recent strategy to recover debts owed by some powerful Nigerians.
According to a report in the Leadership Newspaper, he admitted that they had exhausted options in their current strategy as they have been finding it hard to recover debts from obligors it was set out to collect from.
Here he is on quote
“It is evident that we have exhausted the low hanging fruits and have to roll up our sleeves for a drawn out battle as it becomes harder to get obligors to settle their debts. This has hampered our business model and our third objective of obtaining the best achievable financial returns on assets acquired from the bank.”
“Asides this, it has become challenging for AMCON to fulfill its obligations as it had a funding shortfall of funding for the Repayment of its loans in the past two years. The ramifications for failure by AMCON to recover its debt, principally owed to the CBN, cannot be quantified as it goes beyond economic cost”.
AMCON which is yet to publish its audited financial statement for 2016 on its websites reported that it made a loss of N254 billion in 2016 compared to N304.2 billion in 2015. AMCON currently has a negative shareholding of about N3.9 trillion ballooned by its accumulated losses since inception of about N4.8 trillion.
AMCON’s interest income has also dropped from about N97.2billion in 2015 to N35.2 billion in 2016, Kuru’s first full year of operations. In AMCON’s first full year of operations in 2011, the Corporation acquired N4.2 trillion Eligible Bank Assets (“EBAs”) from 22 Deposit Money Banks. Most of these loans have now been written down culminating in the accumulated losses of N4.8 trillion.
Ahmed Kuru also admitted that AMCON has not been meeting its payment obligations to the Central Bank of Nigeria.
According to him (again on quote)
“In the last two years, AMCON’s debt repayment to the CBN were N456.4 billion and N517.7 billion but actual payments were N256.7 billion and N191.1 billion in 2015 and 2016, respectively. This translates to a funding shortfall of N199.7 billion and N326.4 billion in 2015 and 2016, respectively.
“Of this shortfall, repayment due from AMCON in 2015 and 2016 represented 42 and 53 per cents while the resolution cost fund represented 58 and 47 per cents in 2015 and 2016, respectively. The funding plan envisaged contribution of 70 per cent from the resolution cost fund and 30 per cent from recovery”.
AMCON currently owes the Central Bank of Nigeria about N3.6 trillion, a debt that it is unlikely to repay before its expiration date. AMCON is set to unwind in 2020 according to the law setting it up.
What next?
It is apparent AMCON has no viable plans of recovering trillions of naira of debt which it was originally setup to recover. In establishing AMCON, the original intent was to takeover bad loans of banks, restructure with obligors on terms that would facilitate payment of the loans.
However, most of its obligors who are some of the most powerful Nigerians in the corporate circle have failed to honour these debts leading to mounting interest payment and rising cost of maintaining AMCON.
The corporation spent about N64.7 billion in operating expenses in 2016 (N67.7 billion in 2015). These expenses including salaries amount to about N13 billion. As its plans fail to materialise, its executive compensation remains on a high side, at about N776 million in 2016 alone, competitive with some of Nigeria’s largest banks.
There has been rumour of an AMCON 2.0 which critics have chided leading to Kuru also denying that this was in the offing. It is however, likely that the duration of AMCON could be extended in the near term despite the possibility of a recovery of some of the debts becoming increasingly remote.
Whalai talai.i cannot understand what the management or the managing director is talking about.THE REALLY ISSUES IS WHAT IS YOUR OBJECTIVE ?.WHAT IS OM THE GROUND IS FOR OR WHAT POLITICIANS WANTS ?,which could be to prevent the economy from going bad,or controlling of this damage done by greedy investor and fat cat banker,once you do it,you ask yourself why it happened and the causes of the problem in the first place.
Which means, some body will pay for this mess.i.e some sanction and what it will be,and I think the national assembly should intervene through debate,after debate,they should sent their detail to the presidency and the attorney general,cbn,ministry of finance for action.
I think the failure in the action of amcon,is that Nigerians are very forgiving and merciful,that is why the nass should step in,as this function and the role of amcon should have not last more rhan 3 yrs.one of the staff in the management in amcon,had a masters degree in financial risk regulation.it should be a Nigerian initiative by the nass to prevent,somebody in some group or tribe feeling being cheated .
But again there is an alternative to this nass input,which will be punitive