Site icon Nairametrics

ASUU rejects curriculum prepared by NUC for universities

Key Highlights

 

The Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU) has rejected the Core Curriculum Minimum Academic Standards prepared by the National Universities Commission (NUC), accusing it of imposition

The union said it was nightmarish, a threat to quality university education, and an erosion of powers of the university Senate in Nigerian universities.

This disclosure is contained in a statement titled, ‘Imposition of the Core Curriculum Minimum Academic Standards (CCMAS) on Nigerian Universities’, issued by the National President of ASUU, Professor Emmanuel Osodeke, on Friday, where he described the action of NUC as usurpation of the powers of the university senate.

ASUU explained that its reaction followed several complaints it received on the threats posed by the CCMAS to quality university education and the erosion of powers of the university Senate in Nigerian universities.

News continues after this ad

News continues after this ad

Osodeke said that it was inexplicable that NUC pre-packaged 70% CCMAS contents were being imposed on the Nigerian University System (NUS), adding that university Senates, who are statutorily responsible for academic programme development, were left to work on only 30%.

It stressed that there were growing concerns about the numerous shortcomings and gross inadequacies of the CCMAS documents.

Threats to quality university education

The statement from Osodeke partly reads,

Portends serious danger, flawed

He maintained that there are growing concerns over numerous shortcomings and gross inadequacies of the CCMAS documents, adding that many university administrators, though dissatisfied, were shying away from making public comments on it.

The statement revealed that, however, some university Senates did not hide their displeasure with the ongoing efforts to impose CCMAS on Nigerian universities by the NUC.

However, it suggested that “NUC should encourage universities, as currently being done by the University of Ibadan, to propose innovations for the review of their programmes.

He noted, ”Proposals from across universities should then be sieved and synthesised by more competent expert teams to review the existing BMAS documents and/or create new ones as appropriate. The difference here is the bottom-up approach unlike the top-bottom or take-it-or-leave-it model of the CCMAS. “

Exit mobile version