Site icon Nairametrics

Who pays for defects after you have paid your rent?

property auction

In property law transactions, particularly leasehold (Typical landlord and tenant relationship), it is quite common to come across situations whereby contention regarding who is to fix what in a property may arise. This typically occurs when a Landlord has given up possession of his premises, upon payment of rent by the tenant and then maybe after the tenant moves in or upon further inspection, he realizes that there are certain defects in the property which he or she didn’t know about before paying.

The question then arises, who pays for these defects. The Landlord? Or the tenant?

In Property law transactions, when you buy something, there is an implied covenant that the thing sold/leased is free from any defects. A seller can contract out of that implied covenant by stating that the thing sold is bought ‘as it is’.

Under the respective Tenancy laws of Nigeria, in most Tenancy agreements there are express provisions stipulating certain rights and duties and this is what is termed as “covenants”. There is an implied covenant at common law in respect of use of property that the premises will be fit for human habitation when they are let (but not subsequently). The rule is “caveat lessee”. As Devlin J proposed: “It is the business of the tenant, if he does not protect himself by an express covenant, to satisfy himself that the premises are fit for the purpose for which he wants to have them, whether that fitness depends upon the state of their structure, the state of the law, or any other relevant circumstances”.

[Read Also: LASTMA has no power to impose fine on motorists – Appeal Court]

News continues after this ad

These clauses normally free the Seller from his implied covenant against all latent and patent defects. However, there are two exceptions here, where:

Before looking at how far this protection goes it is important to explain the distinction between these two different types of defects.

Patent defect: Patent defects are defects which the normal person should be able to see upon an inspection of the thing sold. The test is an objective one, namely what could have been seen on the original inspection of the property.

Latent defect: Latent defects are defects which only an expert could discover or defects which cannot be discovered by an ordinary person during a reasonably thorough inspection. These include rusted internal pipes, leaking roofs (except where strain marks make the leak obvious) and defects that have been concealed such as dampness behind a cabinet. The test is what could not normally be seen on inspection.

Where there is some defect in the house which is not apparent on a careful inspection, the seller is liable for those defects if he or she knew about them. In other words, the seller has a duty to reveal to the buyer any latent defects. In such instance of non-disclosure, the seller may be called upon to refund part of the purchase price or even to accept cancellation of the entire sale, depending on the nature or extent of the defect.

[Read Also: Why the Nigerian dream might be “in the abroad”]

So how do you protect yourself as a potential tenant? Below are just a few examples.

Now if the Landlord has defaulted in disclosing these latent defects, the remedy open to one in law is to give notice of repair, demand for Specific performance to repair or as you move out, seek for refund of the rent money. Such covenants as to handle defects must however be expressly written in the tenancy agreement.  This is why it is very important for you to have a tenancy agreement reviewed by your lawyer before you pay money to buy an apartment or to lease one.

[Read Also: Key things to consider when investing in real estate investment trusts]

Exit mobile version