Site icon Nairametrics

EFCC ‘freezes’ bank accounts over alleged ‘diverted’ N48 million crypto mining rig hosting investment 

Federal High Court, REA

A Federal High Court in Abuja has approved a freezing order against five bank accounts implicated in the alleged fraudulent diversion of N48 million investment aimed at purchasing a crypto mining rig package in 2023.

Justice Emeka Nwite issued the interim order on November 28, 2024, following a motion ex parte filed by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).

The case follows a petition signed by Usman Abbas Esq and forwarded to the EFCC.

It states that the suspects, Dimeji Christopher and several others, allegedly “presented a crypto mining investment opportunity to the complainants with promises of mouthwatering returns, which prompted the complainants to invest a total of N48,000,000 through several payments to various bank accounts provided by the suspects.” 

According to the EFCC, the suspects subsequently allegedly failed to deliver the promised return on investment or refund the capital investment, hence the petition and ongoing investigation.

News continues after this ad

A mining rig is a specialized computer system used in mining cryptocurrencies.

 EFCC Investigation 

“Investigation so far has revealed that the suspect did not use the funds for the intended purpose but instead disbursed the funds to accomplices and for personal use,” he added. 

What Transpired in Court 

At the resumed hearing on November 28, 2024, EFCC lawyer Stanley Obilo Esq urged the court to extend the freezing order granted to the Chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission or any officer authorized by him, directing the identified banks to stop all outward payments, operations, or transactions (including any bills of exchange) concerning the bank accounts, pending the conclusion of the ongoing investigation and prosecution.

“Case adjourned to January 29, 2025, for a report,” Nwite ruled. 

What You Should Know: When a freezing order is made by a trial court, the banks are required to comply by blocking transactions in the affected accounts.

However, since the trial court’s order is interim, the affected parties are entitled to approach the court to have it set aside, or the order may expire if the anti-graft agency’s request for renewal is not granted.

Exit mobile version