Site icon Nairametrics

Stamp duty: Court joins School of Banking Honours in suit seeking commission on commercial bank deposits

Federal High Court, Oak Farms

The Federal High Court sitting in Abuja on Tuesday has joined the School of Bank Honours LTD/GTE as a co-defendant in the suit seeking commission or percentage from the accrued deposits paid into the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) NIPOST stamp duty collection account by all commercial banks. 

In its motion on notice seen by Nairametrics, the School of Bank Honours’ lead counsel, Oladipo Okpeseyi, SAN told Justice Inyang Ekwo that the  Nigerian Postal Service (NIPOST) upon due deliberations, executed a Master Service Agreement dated 14th day of September, 2012 with his client, appointing it as its agent, representative and consultant for the recovery of the N50 Stamp Duty on all electronic cashless transfers and Manual Bank Teller Deposits on a commission basis of 20% (Twenty Percent) on each N50 (Fifty Naira) recovered.  

Nairametrics previously reported that the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) filed a preliminary objection against a legal action instituted by Kasmal International Services which sought a court order barring it from disbursing all accrued deposits paid into the CBN NIPOST stamp duty collection account by all commercial banks. 

Counsel for the CBN and the Attorney-General of the Federation, Chief Adeniyi Akintola SAN, had told the Federal High Court Abuja that the purported appointment of the Kasmal by the Nigerian Postal Service (NIPOST) was void at the onset on the ground that stamp duties charges on bank transfers and deposit is a tax that is exclusively administered by the Federal Government through the Federal Inland Revenue Services (FIRS). 

Nairametrics also reported that the court in Abuja had three weeks ago, declined restraining the CBN as requested Kasmal’s lawyer, Dr Alex Izinyon SAN, in a motion ex-parte in the suit marked FHC/ABJ/CS/335/2024, but adjourned for parties to show cause. 

News continues after this ad

Izinyon had contended that while a total of 3.8 trillion naira stands in the Stamp Duty Collection Account ready for distribution between the Federal Government, State Government, Local Governments, the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS), Coordinating Consultants and other bodies, his client was entitled to 15% of the monies having worked as a consultant. 

Recommended reading: Stamp duty: CBN objects Kasmal International Services’ suit against disbursement of ‘trillions’ in commercial banks

School of Honours’ Motion for joinder  

In its motion dated 8th day of April 2024, Mr Adekola Adetoya deposed in an affidavit in support that he is the lead consultant of the School of Honours on the Federal Government (FGN) Contract for Stamp Duties Recovery. 

He said he was instructed to vanguard collections into the Federal Government coffers from the banking sector for all constitutional beneficiaries. 

He maintained that his company is the exclusive holder of the copyright on the N50 Stamp Duty for the Federal Government of Nigeria on all electronic cashless matter of the current suit. 

He stated,  

He stated that based on the research work that was conducted by the company, it approached the 1st Defendant, Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) and the Nigerian Postal Service (NIPOST) for collaboration on revenue generation for the Federal Government of Nigeria. 

Adetoya added,  

What transpired in court 

At the resumed hearing on Tuesday, Okpeseyi told Justice Ekwo to join his client as a co-defendant in the case in line with his motion on notice. 

He explained in his motion that the rights and pecuniary interests of his client will be in jeopardy, if not joined as a co-defendant to the suit filed by Kasmal. 

Justice Ekwo asked the legal team of Kasmal, CBN and the AGF if they are opposing the motion. 

They said they won’t oppose the motion for joinder but would respond to the submissions in it. 

The judge also asked if they have been served with the motion for joinder by the School of Banking Honours in line with the rules of court. 

They responded in the affirmative. 

After hearing from the lawyers, the judge adjourned for hearing but vowed to penalise any lawyer that disrupts the flow of the proceedings. 

He said,  

“Upon consensus of counsel, I make an order adjourning this case to June 5, 2024 for hearing. 

“If the hearing is disrupted by any counsel, that counsel will be personally penalised.” 

More insights

Exit mobile version