Site icon Nairametrics

Google asks court to dismiss Nigerian’s $150 million damages suit 

Google, AI

Google LLC, an American multinational technology company, has urged a Federal High Court, Abuja to dismiss the 150 million dollar suit filed by a Nigerian, Mr Chianugo Peter, against it and GoDaddy.com. 

Google, the 2nd defendant in the suit, told Justice Obiora Egwuatu that Peter’s claims were unmeritorious, unworthy and should be dismissed. 

The company made the averment in its statement of defense dated Nov. 9 and filed Nov. 10 by its lawyer, Mark Mordi, SAN. 

Peter had sued GoDaddy.Com LLC and Google LLC as 1st and 2nd defendants over allegations bordering on the shutdown of his YouTube Audio domain name after eight years of promotional and marketing works.

The plaintiff, through his lawyer, Emmanuel Ekpenyong of Fred-Young & Evans LP, filed the suit marked: FHC/ABJ/CS/238/2023 on April 14. 

Reliefs being sought 

Peter sought the court declaration that he registered the YouTube Audio business name, and commenced trademark registration on the logo of the business name. 

He also said that he secured the YouTubeAudio.com domain name from GoDaddy in good faith to carry out genuine business to host his application thereon to attract users. 

He also sought a declaration that since GoDaddy and Google encouraged him to make use of the YouTubeAudio.com domain name for the past eight years, “they are estopped from claiming that the domain name infringes any of their trademarks or deny the plaintiff the use of the YouTubeAudio.com domain name. He is also seeking: 

Other requests 

Peter, therefore, sought an order directing the defendants to pay him the sum of $50 million for promotional and marketing works on the YouTube Audio business name and YouTube Audio.com domain name for eight years from July 2, 2015, to Dec. 7, 2022. 

Google’s reaction 

In its reaction, Google argued that Peter did not act in good faith when he registered the YOUTUBE AUDIO business name and the YouTubeAudio.com domain name. 

According to the company, the plaintiff was aware of his lack of bona fide claim because he approached it before he commenced operation “and acknowledged the 2nd defendant (Google)’s rights. 

It gave reasons Peter should not be entitled to any of the reliefs sought in his statement of claim. According to Google, the plaintiff does not own the YOUTUBE trademark nor does he have a bona fide claim to use or register any mark that incorporates or is similar to the YOUTUBE trademark. 

When the matter was called on Monday, the plaintiff’s counsel, Jude Otakpor, told the court that while he was in receipt of Google’s statement of defence, GoDaddy was yet to put up an appearance in court. The lawyer, who appeared for Google, Okimute Ohwahwa, said she had an application for an extension of time to regularise their processes. 

Ohwahwa said their statement of defence was dated Nov. 9 and filed Nov. 10. Otakpor did not oppose Ohwahwa’s oral application and Justice Egwuatu granted it. Otakpor, however, sought an adjournment to enable them to file a reply to Google’s statement of defence. 

The judge, who adjourned the matter until Feb 12, 2024, directed that a hearing notice be issued on GoDaddy. 

 

Exit mobile version