Site icon Nairametrics

Rivers floors FG as court bars FG from deducting from federation account to fund Police

Governor Wike, FCT

FCT Minister, Nyesom Wike.

An Abuja division of the federal high court has declared unlaw, the deductions by the federal government from the Federation Account for funding of the Nigeria Police Trust Fund.

Justice Ahmed Mohammed ruled on Tuesday that the direct deduction of funds from the federation account to fund the Nigeria Police Force (NPF) is illegal.

In a suit filed by the Rivers Government through its attorney general, the state government sought an order stopping the deduction of funds from the federation account for the funding of the Nigeria Police Trust Fund scheme.

Read: VAT Dispute: Rivers drags FIRS to supreme court, seeks disbandment of appeal court panel

Backstory

Read: Governor Wike defies FG, signs VAT collection bill into law

News continues after this ad

What the judge ruled

Justice Mohammed held that the provisions of section 4(1)(a) (b) of the Police Trust Fund Act 2019, requiring the deduction of 0.05 percent of any fund in the federation account and 0.005 percent of the net profit of companies operating in Nigeria to fund the police is unconstitutional.

The judge consequently declared the section of the law permitting the direct deduction of any sum or percentage of revenue accruing to the federation account or which ought to have been paid into the federation account for the purpose of providing funds for the Nigerian Police Trust Fund as “unconstitutional, null and void.”

Read: FG approves 20% salary increase for Police, grants tax waiver to junior officers

Justice Mohammed agreed with the Rivers government that by virtue of Section 162 (3) of the Nigerian Constitution, funds standing to the credit of the Federation Account “can only be distributed among the Federal Government, State Governments and Local Government Councils in each state of Nigeria and not directly to any agency of the Federal Government including the Nigeria Police Force.”

The judge also said it was only Rivers that would benefit from the refund and not the 35 states since the court was not a “Father Christmas” that granted what was not sought.

Exit mobile version